Monash University, Melbourne
Instinct tells us that the move by Honorable Prime Minister to appoint Dr. John Roughan as Secretary to PM is good but despite its appearance, it is a bad move.
- The government by appointing Dr. Roughan has effectively removed a very staunch critique of its policies. The part played by Dr. Roughan as ‘keeper of conscience’ cannot be replaced by any other individual. Neither the parliamentary opposition, nor the SIDT has the boldness to speak out on social issues the way Dr. Roughan has done in the last 20 years. The government is doing itself a disfavor.
- Heading an NGO is an entirely different role to heading the Government’s chief ministry – the PM’s office with the myriad of responsibilities, demands by subordinates and the public and required skill sets. Dr. Roughan has experience and wisdom, but would he cope with the demands of public life? Believe it or not, the government would have to retrain Dr. Roughan for the demands of government life.
- Contrary to what many believe, the problems we faced in the last 28 years have little to do with poor leaders but more to do with the poor environment within which leaders operate. In order to have effective leaders, the environment in which they operate must be conducive. Having people the caliber of Dr. Roughan without changing the relevant structures does not promise much hope.
- Dr. Roughan is also putting his credibility and history of independence at stake by taking up a four year contract with the government. Whilst, he may continue to write his columns, it would be hard to imagine how credible his writings on social issues would be when he is on government payroll.
- As a leader in civil society and social commentator, the efficacy of his role cannot be questioned. On the other hand, any such efficacy in implementation of government policy cannot be guaranteed.
By appointing Dr. John Roughan as secretary to PM, the government losses, Dr. John Roughan losses and we all lose. Who says instincts can be trusted?
Philip Tagini is a
PhD Candidate
Minerals Law and Policy
Monash University
1 comment:
Tagini, as good call but I disagree with your views. The tendency is to shoot good things down whenever they offer promise. What have you to offer then?
Do not mistake the woods for the forest. I believe good things can come and of course instincts can be trusted. After all instinct is the bottomline for survival.
Post a Comment